Friday 21 December 2012

Audience Feedback

The questions that I asked people:
1. Do you think that all the three media pieces link in some way together?
2. What would you change about any of the three pieces?
3. Do they give you the relevant information that you need?
4. Do you think the voice over suits the topic?
5. Do you think the are edited to a high standard?

Audio Footage:
 



Facebook Feedback:


Thursday 20 December 2012

Codes and Conventions of a newspaper advertisement


Recording and editing documentary and radio trailer

Scripting Radio Trailer.


  • Take part of documentary vox pop to start.
v/o: Has your favorite pair of shoes ever damaged your feet?

  • Take part of 'Joan Turley' interview out describing damage of her feet
v/o: Shoes are a world wide phenonam, but for some people they are an addiction

  • Take part of Debra Freckletons interview showing how much of a shoe horder she is
v/o: Buckle up and get ready for Well Heeled, Thursday 7pm, Channel 4.

Wednesday 19 December 2012

Codes and Conventions of a radio trailer

Scripting voiceover

In this lesson, all three of us sat down and decided where the best place for the voice over would be, and we decided that we would put it over the opening sequence to introduce the documentary, and then we would then collect a montarge of our own pictures that we collected to introduce each of the main interviews, we did this throughout.

VOXPOPS

TITLE SEQUENCE

v/o: Everyone has their favorite pairs of shoes and with over 43 million pairs of shoes sold each year in the UK alone thats hardly suprising. For some people these every day nessesities can be a painful experience, but for others it can become an addiction.

INTERVIEW WITH DEBRA FRECKLETON

INTERVIEW WITH JOAN TURLEY

v/o: Shoes are not always just for looking stylish some peoples footwear is esencial for their workplace

INTERVIEW WITH CLAIRE MCLAUGHLIN

INTERVIEW WITH PHIL SQUIRES

v/o: With an ever increasing market the public have more choice over where to shop, so how are retailers competing to keep their customers coming back?

INTERVIEW WITH IAN SMITH

v/o: Over recent years both independent designers and major shoe retailers have been producing more unique styles of shoes targeting a more specific audience as people try to find their own style

INTERVIEW WITH GRACE WATTS

INTERVIEW WITH NATALIE WARREN.

Thursday 22 November 2012

Logging Sheet

We have been keeping a log of the different footage that we had filmed during each interview.
 

 

Wednesday 21 November 2012

Filming: Shop fronts

We went to Liverpool and filmed different but revelent shop fronts in the town centre and these are some of the shops that we filmed:
  • Kurt Geiger
  • Schuh
  • Missie
  • Footasylum
  • Clarks
  • Office

Filming: Stop motion

In this lesson, we attempted some more stop motion footage that we may use for our title sequence. This involved a pair of heels and a pair of Vans. This was good to practice with because we could see the different framing and how much we actually had to move the shoe in order for it to look like it was moving by itself.

Filming: Voxpops and the second Shoe Market interview


We filmed four voxpops in Liscard, and asked them the question 'what is your favorite shoe?'


We then had to go back to the Shoe Market to refilm the parts that werent good enough the first time, but the woman was not avaliable again so we just ended up filming the whole thing again, but this was good because we could use the first filming as a practise run.

Filming: Dr Martens interview

We went out and interviewed Grace from the Liverpool Dr Martens shop, we asked her questions about the styles of shoes that they sell.

Tuesday 20 November 2012

Filming: Podiatrist, Shoemarket & Younger Person Interview

In this lesson, we went out of school and filmed Claire, the Podiatrist. Brenda from the Shoemarket employee and Hannah Thomson who was our younger person. We made the questions proir to the interviews, so we could make amendments if the questions werent relevent.



We framed each of these on the right hand side but still in the rule of thirds, as this is the codes and conventions of an interview and made sure the eyeline and lighting was perfect.

Filming: With a shoe designer (Natalie Warren)


In todays lesson, we went and filmed an interview with Natalie Warren-a shoe designer. Whilst here we took cutaways so we could include them in our documentary. We also took pictures so we could show that it was us filming, and showed what the camera looked like that we had set up.
 
Natalie was set up in the right frame and the lighting was good and she spoke clearly and detailed and gave us all the information that we needed to build up the documentary.

Filming: Interview with older person (Joan Turley)

In todays lesson, we went out and filmed an older person and asked them a series of questions that we had prepared prior to the interview. We took pictures of what we were doing aswell so we could jusitfy it was us filming.


When looking back at this interview, I think that we did a good job, we learnt from the test interview and made sure that the lighting was good and that the interviewee was eyeline with the interviewer. Joan was framed well in the rule of thirds and was positioned in the correct place.

Filming: Test Title Sequence

In todays lesson, we experimented and filmed our title sequence. This will prepare us for when we make our actual title sequence and we will use the ideas that we have used in the testing, in the real thing.



When filming this, it was very time consuming. We had to push each shoe very slightly and shot it, and carry on doing this to each shoe, so when we looked back on the film, it looked like the shoes were walking by themselves. We filmed this a number of times, in different places to see what would suit what mise en scene we were trying to create, this helped us understand and develop what we were aimed to achieve

For the final attempt we did in this lesson, we put the shoes on the table and made the shoes walk in and out of shot. Shooting this has really helped us to understand and develop our skills in creating a good stop-motion video, something we are considering a lot for our title sequence.

Thursday 8 November 2012

Filming: Test Interview

We did a test interview to familiarise ourselves with the equipment that we will be using. This was very beneficial because we could also practise with the framing of the interviewee and know what were doing for the other interviews.

As we can see, the way we had postitioned Don in the framing, we did this well. But the downside of this interview was the interviewer wasnt at eye level with the interviewee, which caused Don to look up. We can learn from this and in our actual interviews we could amend this and make sure that we are eye level with the interviewee. Another thing that let us down in this interview was the lighting, although we did shut the blinds and the curtains, this did not help because we could see on the wall behind the change in the light from outside, we would have to change this and make sure that this did not happen when we were properly filming.

Planning.

We made story boards so we could have a step by step plan of what we were doing.
I drawn single frames of each of the interviews that I am going to conduct.

Sunday 30 September 2012

Research for documentary

Below is a list of archive material we found whilst researching our documentary. We will use the footage in our 5 minute documentary: -
Shoes song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCF3ywukQYA
Wizard Of Oz - Shoe Scene http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooM-RGUTe2E
Kurt Geiger Adverts http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GqPILgHAI4
Paolo Nutini - New Shoes Song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHgNpto9ooY
Confessions Of A Shopaholic - Fight Scene http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npFBRp716Qw
How Nike Trainers Have Changed Over The Years http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-8G24Clvck
Shoe Fight Scene From The Hannah Montana Movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5c-vsPcl7k Skate Shoes Advert For Vans http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNBi_rSUxLM

Saturday 29 September 2012

Formal Proposal


Topic: Shoes

Type of documentary: Mixed, closed, multi-stranded

Style of documentary: Light hearted, informative

Channel: Channel 4 at 7:00pm inherting the programme audience after Hollyoaks as it targets the same audience

Age: Between 16-30, mainly female

Primary research: Interviews with people from shoe shops and people who have past with shoes

Secondary research: archive material such as different types of shoes from the past

Narative structure: Non-linear

Content: Voxpops, video interviews, archive footage, cahnging styles of shoes, how shoes represent personality

Resources: Camera. tri-pod, voice recorder, microphone, telephone.

Brainstorm of content for documentary.

Friday 28 September 2012

Target Audience Research

We made a questionnaire and handed it out to 30 people so we could find out what other people who would be watching the documentary would like to see.


After getting people to fill in the questionnaire, we then gathered the results together this was what we found.


.



 
These are some voice recordings we got off people that answered the questionnaires.

 
 
 
We also took video recordings of people that took part in the questionnaire.
 
 
 

Sunday 2 September 2012

Questionnaire


We produced a questionnaire in order to find out what the audience would like to see in the documentary because if we dont show the audience what they want they wont watch it.
 
1.     Are you:

 Male      Female

2.     What age are you?

16-20 □    21-25 □   26-30 □   30+ □
 
3.     What is your favourite colour? ___________________________

4.     What is your favourite TV channel?

BBC1 □   BBC2 □   ITV1 □   Channel 4 □   Channel 5 □

5.     What kind of documentaries do you like?

Historical □   Scientific □   Current Affairs □   Fashion □

Nature □   Celebrity □   Other □   If other, please specify _____________

6.     Would you rather a documentary be:

Serious □   Light hearted □   Informative □   Comical □

7.     What size shoe are you? ________

8.     What is your favourite pair of shoes? _____________

9.     How many pairs of shoes do you own?

      1-5□   6-10 □   11-20 □   20+ □

10.             How many pairs of shoes do you buy a year?

1-5 □   6-10 □   11-20 □   20+ □

11.            Where do you buy your shoes from? _________________________

12.            How much do you spend on shoes per year?

Less than £10 □    Over £10 □   Over £50 □   Over £100 □

13.            What is the most you have ever spent on shoes?

Less than £10 □    Over £10 □   Over £50 □   Over £100 □

14.            What type of shoes do you prefer?

High heels □   Low heels □   Flats □   Boots □   Sandals □ Trainers □   Pumps□   Flip flops □   Wellies □   Other □ 

 If other, please specify ____________________________

 

 

 

 

 

Friday 31 August 2012

Brainstorming

Ideas for possible ideas for the documentary Diet(s) Celebrity Toys Tv programmes Money Food Tattoos Rasism Feminism Relaxation Tv Programmes Piercings Clothes/fashion Technology Hair Seasons Makeup Social Networking Tanning Music Stereotypes School Cake Accents Plastic Surgery Teeth Love Weight Jobs Culture Uniform Conflict Religion Liverpool Feet Recycling Role Models Pushy Parents University Life Public Transport.

TV Scheduling

Evaluation of 'Its Good to Talk'

Evaluation of the Preliminary task: When looking back at the documentary that we made, I found alot of things that could be changed and made better these include, ending the cuts too quickly, we should of gave more time, instead of cutting as soon as we did. We didnt include any fade into our work, this would of made it more appealing to the audience and create tension. The rule of thirds was not done correctly as we did not position Beth were we should of she was almost in the middle, were she should of been at the right hand side of the camera when being interviewed. Our song choice was incorrect because there was lyrics in the song, this took away the main image because the audience would be concentrating on the song rather listening to the main topic and thats what the interviewee was talking about. We didnt include the cutaways so it was just one whole boring documentary watching one person, which didnt give the audience enough detail because they couldnt get into depth about what they were listening to. We also didnt have any jumpcuts it just stayed focused on the one thing. The interviewee was moving, she didnt stay still and her eyeline was not correct as she looked in different directions when answering the questions, she didnt look interested, she was also slanted and it didnt look like a professional interview which was not right. The questions were not always clear so we had trouble trying to listening to what the interviewer was asking, we could only make out what she was saying by the reply that the interviewee was saying. The mise-en-scene didnt have any relevence to the interview. The camera work wasnt steady and looked unprofessional. There was parts of the interview were the music was louder in one place than in others so it was very jumpy. To end the documentary there should of been a fade, so the audience new that it was coming to an end and could create tension to finish it off.

Tuesday 28 August 2012

Friday 24 August 2012